Determinant of a Sparse Matrix

Data Structures project to find the determinant of any NxN matrix while only storing any non-zero values.

Role: Student | Date: February 16, 2018

Project Overview

  • Project Type: Algorithm, Data Structures
  • Tools Used: Java
  • Project Goals:
    • Create a sparse matrix that only stores non-zero values.
    • Using the sparse matrix, recursively find the determinant of the matrix.
application terminal view

The Problem / Challenge

This project focuses on implementing data structures to efficiently compute the determinant of an N×N matrix as part of a university assignment. The goal is to develop a sparse matrix representation that stores only non-zero values, reducing memory usage and improving performance. By applying recursive methods to determine the determinant, this project reinforces key concepts in data structures and algorithm design while providing hands-on experience with Java implementation.

The Process

1. Understanding the Problem Statement

The goal was to compute the determinant of an NxN sparse matrix, meaning a matrix where most elements are zero. Instead of storing the entire matrix in memory, the program only stored non-zero values using an efficient data structure.

2. Choosing a Data Structure

Since the matrix is sparse, a compact storage solution was required. The approach taken:

  • Used a two-dimensional data structure:
    • The first dimension was an array that indexed rows.
    • The second dimension was a stack that stored column indices along with their corresponding non-zero values.
  • This design ensured memory efficiency by avoiding storage of unnecessary zeros.

3. Implementing the Sparse Matrix Representation

A class was created to handle an NxN matrix as input. A function processed this matrix and converted it into the sparse format by:

  • Iterating over all elements.
  • Storing only non-zero elements in the structured array-stack format.

4. Computing the Determinant Using Cofactor Expansion

The determinant was calculated recursively using Cofactor Expansion. This involved:

  • Choosing a row or column (typically the first row for simplicity).
  • Expanding along that row:
    • Multiplying each element by its cofactor.
    • Recursively computing the determinant of the smaller submatrix (minor).
  • Applying the (-1)^(row + column) rule to alternate signs.

5. Handling Sparse Properties in the Calculation

If an element was not found in the sparse structure, it was assumed to be zero, allowing for skipping unnecessary calculations. This optimization significantly improved efficiency, as operations were only performed on non-zero elements.

6. Solving for the Determinant

The recursive function computed determinants by reducing the problem to smaller submatrices. The program outputted the final determinant of the sparse matrix.

application terminal view application terminal view

Analysis

This project demonstrated efficient memory management using sparse matrix storage and an optimized recursive algorithm for determinant calculation. Implementing cofactor expansion while leveraging the sparse structure led to significant performance improvements for large matrices. In the future, I would investigate alternative data structures, such as hash maps or compressed sparse row (CSR) format, to further optimize storage and retrieval efficiency for even larger matrices.

Interested in working together on a similar project?